
Hi Scott,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 02/08/2013 09:12:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD static int reserve_stacks(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
ulong *s;
+#endif
/* setup stack pointer for exceptions */ gd->dest_addr_sp -= 16; gd->dest_addr_sp &= ~0xf;
@@ -398,6 +532,14 @@ static int reserve_stacks(void) /* leave 3 words for abort-stack, plus 1 for alignment */ gd->dest_addr_sp -= 16;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
/* Clear initial stack frame */
s = (ulong *) gd->dest_addr_sp;
*s = 0; /* Terminate back chain */
*++s = 0; /* NULL return address */
gd->dest_addr_sp = (ulong) s;
+#endif
PPC ABI requires 16-byte stack alignment, which would be broken by the CONFIG_USE_IRQ section (which even still has an "ARM ABI" comment).
I think this entire function should be kept in arch code. Stack layout is inherently architecture/ABI specific. Some architectures even have a stack that grows upward (not sure if any such are supported by U-Boot).
Thanks for reviewing all this.
While I am working to avoid it, one option is to create a weak function which archs can override. The reason I am keen to avoid it, at least for a first implementation, is that it obscures the similarities. In this case we could just just force 16-byte alignment, and make the PPC code unconditional. It shouldn't hurt anything.
Regards, Simon
-Scott