On Friday 24 March 2017 02:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Lokesh,
On 3/24/2017 3:54 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Up till this commit passing NULL as input parameter was allowed, but not handled properly.
When one passed NULL to one of this function parameters, the code was executed causing data abort.
However, what is more interesting, the abort was not caught because of code execution in HYP mode with masked CPSR A bit ("Imprecise Data Abort mask bit). The TI's AM57xx SoC switch to HYP mode with A bit masked in lowlevel_init.S due to SMC call. Such operation (by default) is performed in SoC ROM code.
The problem would pop up when one:
- Switch back to SVC mode after disabling LPAE support
- Somebody enables A bit (by executing cpsie a asm instruction)
and then the previously described exception would be caught.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski lukma@denx.de
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c | 10 ++++++----
This has been moved to arch/arm/mach-omap2/clocks-common.c Please use the latest U-Boot.
Ok. I'm not working on a cutting-edge u-boot.
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c index 097b8e3..157155a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c @@ -822,27 +822,29 @@ void do_enable_clocks(u32 const *clk_domains, u32 i, max = 100;
/* Put the clock domains in SW_WKUP mode */
- for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains[i]; i++) {
- for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains && clk_domains[i];
i++) {
Instead of checking for clk_domains every time, can we use max as ARRAY_SIZE(clk_domains)?
do_enable_clocks() accepts pointer to u32 as an argument (clk_domains). IMHO the ARRAY_SIZE(clk_domains) would be 1 - always.
you are right. Discard my comment.
Thanks and regards, Lokesh