On 9/3/07, Grant Likely grant.likely@secretlab.ca wrote:
On 9/3/07, Jerry Van Baren vanbargw@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
The libfdt custodian repo is on the denx.de site, but should be the same as the mainline. I would say patch your 5xxx custodian repo, publishing the new functions that impact the libfdt stuff as a separate patch and The List can discuss them. I'll "ack" them and apply them to my repo as well, but NBD. I will plan on updating the 83xx implementation(s) and publish them for Kim to ack/adopt as well.
Ah, okay. I was more wondering if there was a libfdt repo that was upstream and separate from u-boot (as dtc uses libfdt also). Okay, I'll rebase against wd's mainline and repost ASAP.
Hmmm. On a third reading, I don't think the fixup functions belong in libfdt, or at least not completely. I'll add a function 'fdt_find_and_setprop()' which handles the logic, but I'll keep a couple of helpers in cpu/mpc5200/cpu.c just because they involve printf() calls for user feedback and printf() calls don't really belong in libfdt.
Cheers, g.
Cheers, g.
-- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195