25 Aug
2011
25 Aug
'11
1:04 a.m.
Dear Wolfgang,
On 24 août 2011, at 22:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Eric Jarrige,
In message 2B613989-ADDB-43D6-A8C3-A30D5245262A@armadeus.org you wrote:
I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 code
- do you know the reason why not just use debug()?
dm9000 does not use debug() at all. That's the reason to fix the printf issues as a first priority by using the DM9000_DBG.
NAK.
If you touch that, then please do it right: us debug() instead, and remove DM9000_DBG. Thanks.
Do you mean both changes in one patch?
Best regards, Eric