Hi Tom,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 at 11:44, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:58:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
I found these:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=262148&state=* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210925121958.26001-1-pali@...
IMO the second one from Pali makes sense, but it was never followed up. It doesn't look too difficult.
We should have a policy that if people complain about a patch but don't follow up, we apply the patch we have.
I think the patch from Pali was the right direction, but as I noted, I wanted to see it implemented for some other UARTs as well, and it wasn't high on anyone elses priority list. Covering ns16550-style UARTs too would be good.
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/issues/28
Regards, Simon