On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07:37AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/18/2012 04:24 PM, Allen Martin wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:06:40PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:02 AM, Allen Martin wrote:
...
Perhaps we can just create a new tegra_spl board for the SPL rather than having an SPL variant for each board. Still, I don't know how we'd represent the UART differences if we did that though.
I tossed out that idea as part of the discussion about using a separate toolchain for the SPL, but Wolfgang shot it down:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122248.html
Is that the right link? That message seems to be talking about a CROSS_COMPILE_SPL variable rather than having a separate boards.cfg entry for a Tegra SPL.
This was the piece I was referring to, which was a conversation about exactly this topic (armv4 SPL and armv7 u-boot):
The architecture seems harder to fix. It seems like I really have to have two entries in boards.cfg, which means two passes of config/make.
This should be not needed; I also do not think this would be an acceptable approach.
-Allen