On 02/13/2014 01:19 PM, Holger Brunck wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 02/13/2014 01:14 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:10:51 +0100, Holger Brunck
What if a new board/config does not want to use a bootcount limit?
all keymile boards use this and I don't see a usecase now and in the future that a board don't need it, thats why I decided to remove this here. IMHO it makes the code more readable to make only configurable what really needs to be configurable.
Alright. And what about the keymile boards maintainer?
ah I see I missed to set Valentin on CC for this patch serie. Ok I add him for this discussion.
@Valentin: Could you Ack this Patch serie or say if something is missing
I have actually reviewed this series when it was applied in our interanl branch and tested them on most of our kirkwood boards.
So for the whole series:
Acked-by: Valentin Longchamp valentin.longchamp@keymile.com