Hello Lukasz,
Am 31.03.2014 16:36, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
Hi Simon,
Hi Lukasz,
On 27 March 2014 11:33, Lukasz Majewskil.majewski@samsung.com wrote: Hi Simon, Heiko
From: Aaron Durbinadurbin@chromium.org
The current pmic i2c code assumes the current i2c bus is the same as the pmic device's bus. There is nothing ensuring that to be true. Therefore, select the proper bus before performing a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbinadurbin@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Simon Glasssjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Simon Glasssjg@chromium.org
drivers/power/power_i2c.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/power/power_i2c.c b/drivers/power/power_i2c.c index ac76870..594cd11 100644 --- a/drivers/power/power_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/power/power_i2c.c @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ int pmic_reg_write(struct pmic *p, u32 reg, u32 val) if (check_reg(p, reg)) return -1;
I2C_SET_BUS(p->bus);Hadn't we had a discussion about this explicit setting of I2C some time ago? I thought that this problem was solved within the I2C rework.
Also I might be wrong, so please correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the I2C_SET_BUS() macro regarded as a obsolete after the I2C rework?
Agreed that would be ideal, but we would have to pass the bus number of the i2c_read/write() functions. I don't believe the i2c code has got that far yet.
Unfortunately it doesn't work without this patch.
If Heiko doesn't object, then I won't protest.
It s okay for me, so to clarify:
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de
bye, Heiko