
On 11.10.17 22:30, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Alexander Graf agraf@suse.de wrote:
On 10.10.17 14:22, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm@linaro.org
Not complete, but enough for Shell.efi and SCT.efi.
Initial skeleton written by Leif, and then implementation by myself.
Cc: Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com
include/efi_api.h | 41 ++++++++++ include/efi_loader.h | 3 + lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 2 +- lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 6 ++ lib/efi_loader/efi_unicode.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 lib/efi_loader/efi_unicode.c
diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h index 164147dc87..38dd1240c1 100644 --- a/include/efi_api.h +++ b/include/efi_api.h @@ -797,6 +797,47 @@ struct efi_hii_string_protocol { efi_uintn_t *secondary_languages_size); };
+/*
- Both UNICODE_COLLATION protocols seem to be the same thing, but
- advertised with two different GUID's because, why not?
- */
+#define EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL_GUID \
EFI_GUID(0x1d85cd7f, 0xf43d, 0x11d2, \
0x9a, 0x0c, 0x00, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d)
+#define EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2_GUID \
EFI_GUID(0xa4c751fc, 0x23ae, 0x4c3e, \
0x92, 0xe9, 0x49, 0x64, 0xcf, 0x63, 0xf3, 0x49)
+struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol {
efi_intn_t (EFIAPI *stri_coll)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t s1,
efi_string_t s2);
bool (EFIAPI *metai_match)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t string,
efi_string_t pattern);
void (EFIAPI *str_lwr)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t string);
void (EFIAPI *str_upr)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t string);
void (EFIAPI *fat_to_str)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_uintn_t fat_size,
uint8_t *fat,
efi_string_t string);
bool (EFIAPI *str_to_fat)(
struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t string,
efi_uintn_t fat_size,
uint8_t *fat);
uint8_t *supported_languages;
+};
#define EFI_GOP_GUID \ EFI_GUID(0x9042a9de, 0x23dc, 0x4a38, \ 0x96, 0xfb, 0x7a, 0xde, 0xd0, 0x80, 0x51, 0x6a) diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h index 591bf07e7a..af6812b2b4 100644 --- a/include/efi_loader.h +++ b/include/efi_loader.h @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ extern const struct efi_device_path_utilities_protocol efi_device_path_utilities extern const struct efi_hii_config_routing_protocol efi_hii_config_routing; extern const struct efi_hii_database_protocol efi_hii_database; extern const struct efi_hii_string_protocol efi_hii_string; +extern const struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol efi_unicode_collation;
uint16_t *efi_dp_str(struct efi_device_path *dp);
@@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_device_path_utilities_protocol; extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_hii_config_routing_protocol; extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_hii_database_protocol; extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_hii_string_protocol; +extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol; +extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol2;
extern unsigned int __efi_runtime_start, __efi_runtime_stop; extern unsigned int __efi_runtime_rel_start, __efi_runtime_rel_stop; diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile index 725e0cba85..7ea96a4f1c 100644 --- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ endif obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO) += helloworld_efi.o obj-y += efi_image_loader.o efi_boottime.o efi_runtime.o efi_console.o obj-y += efi_memory.o efi_device_path_to_text.o efi_device_path.o -obj-y += efi_device_path_utilities.o efi_hii.o +obj-y += efi_device_path_utilities.o efi_hii.o efi_unicode.o obj-y += efi_file.o efi_variable.o efi_bootmgr.o obj-$(CONFIG_LCD) += efi_gop.o obj-$(CONFIG_DM_VIDEO) += efi_gop.o diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c index c179afc25a..b568f3f162 100644 --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c @@ -1166,6 +1166,12 @@ void efi_setup_loaded_image(struct efi_loaded_image *info, struct efi_object *ob obj->protocols[7].guid = &efi_guid_hii_config_routing_protocol; obj->protocols[7].protocol_interface = (void *)&efi_hii_config_routing;
obj->protocols[8].guid = &efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol;
obj->protocols[8].protocol_interface = (void *)&efi_unicode_collation;
obj->protocols[9].guid = &efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol2;
obj->protocols[9].protocol_interface = (void *)&efi_unicode_collation;
info->file_path = file_path; info->device_handle = efi_dp_find_obj(device_path, NULL);
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_unicode.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_unicode.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2c6302df25 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_unicode.c @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +/* +* EFI Unicode interface
- Copyright (c) 2017 Leif Lindholm
- SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
- */
+#include <common.h> +#include <charset.h> +#include <linux/ctype.h> +#include <efi_loader.h>
+const efi_guid_t efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol =
EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL_GUID;
+const efi_guid_t efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol2 =
EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2_GUID;
+static int matchn(efi_string_t s1, unsigned n1, efi_string_t s2, unsigned n2) +{
char u1[MAX_UTF8_PER_UTF16 * n1 + 1];
char u2[MAX_UTF8_PER_UTF16 * n2 + 1];
*utf16_to_utf8((u8 *)u1, s1, n1) = '\0';
*utf16_to_utf8((u8 *)u2, s2, n2) = '\0';
return strcasecmp(u1, u2);
+}
+static efi_intn_t EFIAPI stri_coll(struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t s1,
efi_string_t s2)
+{
EFI_ENTRY("%p, \"%ls\", \"%ls\"", this, s1, s2);
unsigned n1 = utf16_strlen(s1);
unsigned n2 = utf16_strlen(s2);
return EFI_EXIT(matchn(s1, n1, s2, n2));
+}
+static bool match(efi_string_t string, efi_string_t pattern) +{
while (true) {
uint16_t p = *pattern++;
bool matches = false;
if (p == '\0' || *string == '\0') {
/*
* End of pattern or string, succeed if
* end of both:
*/
return *string == p;
}
switch (p) {
case '*':
/* Match zero or more chars: */
while (*string != '\0') {
if (match(string, pattern))
return true;
string++;
}
return match(string, pattern);
case '?':
/* Match any one char: */
string++;
break;
case '[':
/* Match char set, either [abc] or [a-c]: */
if (pattern[0] == '\0' || pattern[0] == ']') {
/* invalid pattern */
return false;
}
if (pattern[1] == '-') {
uint16_t lo, hi, c;
/* range: [a-c] */
lo = pattern[0];
hi = pattern[2];
if (hi == '\0' || hi == ']' || pattern[3] != ']') {
/* invalid pattern */
return false;
}
c = tolower(*string);
lo = tolower(lo);
hi = tolower(hi);
if (lo <= c && c <= hi)
matches = true;
pattern += 4;
} else {
/* set: [abc] */
while ((p = *pattern++) && p != ']')
if (matchn(string, 1, &p, 1))
matches = true;
}
if (!matches)
return false;
string++;
break;
default:
if (matchn(string, 1, &p, 1))
return false;
string++;
break;
}
}
+}
+static bool EFIAPI metai_match(struct efi_unicode_collation_protocol *this,
efi_string_t string,
efi_string_t pattern)
+{
EFI_ENTRY("%p, \"%ls\", \"%ls\"", this, string, pattern);
return EFI_EXIT(match(string, pattern));
EFI_EXIT wants a success/failure parameter, not true/false (which can be randomly defined). Please either have match() return EFI return codes or convert it in here :).
That isn't strictly true, it does use typeof(ret).. and while it masks the resulting debug msg with ~EFI_ERROR_MASK, in practice it isn't a problem with boolean return. Just a bit funny.
And there already other EFI entry points that return something other than efi_status_t.. trying to force them all into efi_status_t mold makes them somewhat more awkward.
Well, anything that casts well into an integer is reasonably valid for EFI_EXIT(). But with bool things aren't always as clear as they should be. I'm for example not 100% sure if the return value of a bool function can never be different from 0 or 1.
So please just use something more obvious and keep bool values as inputs for conditional branches :). Even something like EFI_EXIT(foo ? EFI_TRUE : EFI_FALSE); would work for me. Or you just make the return type of those functions an enum efi_bool.
The resulting code should basically be the same if the compiler is smart, but at least I'm 100% sure when reading it that it does "the right thing".
Alex