Le 28/01/2011 19:08, Haiying Wang a écrit :
I see patch 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, and 7/7. Where are the rest?
Sorry, patch 7/7 is a wrong number here. I kept the patch # as 3/8/, 4/8, 5/8, 8/8 to be consistent with the order in the patchset(v2) I submitted in last December. I thought it would be clearer to compare them with v2 version and review. Patch 1/8,2/8 have been applied by Kumar, patch 6/8, 7/8 remain the same as v2 version. This patch, is a new patch because that TPL still needs --gc-sections in linker option to do partial link.
If it is preferable to have new whole set of patch, I can reorder them from 3/8-8/8 plus this one to submit.
I would suggest to simply number patches from 1 to N for each version even if that means the same patch gets numbered differently across versions, because readers of a given version may not have read the previous one. A patchset should be self-sufficient and self-consistent IMO.
Amicalement,