Tom
On 05/02/2016 12:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
Joe
On 05/02/2016 11:08 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Dan Murphy dmurphy@ti.com wrote:
Add the ability to read the phy-handle node of the cpsw slave. Upon reading this handle the phy-id can be stored based on the reg node in the DT.
The phy-handle also needs to be stored and passed to the phy to access any phy data that is available.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy dmurphy@ti.com
v7 - Fixed checkpatch issues - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610946/ Checkpatch LTL issues still remain and resolving will break readability
WARNING: line over 80 characters #47: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1230: WARNING: line over 80 characters #50: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1233:
Looks like you dropped most of the Acked-by and Tested-by from the last version. Please resend with those included.
Do we include the Acked-by in the patch?
So, you don't need to resend vX -> v(X+1) if the only change for the whole series is collecting ack/tested/reviewed, patchwork does that for us. If you're making changes to part of a series from vX -> v(X+1) and some areas are unchanged, yes, you should collect the previous acked/reviewed. I think you need to go back and see what ack/tested/reviewed still apply and include those in v8, yes. Thanks!
Do I have to up rev the series if I am just adding in acked/reviewed information?
Dan