Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1274392850.18152.253.camel@petert you wrote:
I didn't express it well, but what I was getting at was that the "Testing X .. Y" would ideally state exactly what is being tested.
We have full agreement here.
Unaligned addresses would still be allowed. I think right now the end address is always automatically aligned to the same alignment as the start address though, so the current output is very misleading.
Agreed, too.
You can see the starting alignment was respected, but the ending alignment was truncated to be 32-bit aligned to the starting address. In the above example, I think it would be nice to see "Testing 00001003 ... 00001ffe". Or some other way such that the user knows that their input wasn't executed to a T; their end address was truncated.
Yep. We are in sync.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk