
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 06:16, Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:13 PM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 04:54, Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 12:45 AM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:05, Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote:
Am Mo., 3. Dez. 2018, 19:20 hat Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org geschrieben:
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 00:50, Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote: > > Simon, > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:45 AM Simon Goldschmidt > simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:02 AM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 05:25, Simon Goldschmidt > > > simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > This series fixes CVE-2018-18440 ("insufficient boundary checks in > > > > filesystem image load") by adding restrictions to the 'load' > > > > command and fixes CVE-2018-18439 ("insufficient boundary checks in > > > > network image boot") by adding restrictions to the tftp code. > > > > > > > > The functions from lmb.c are used to setup regions of allowed and > > > > reserved memory. Then, the file size to load is checked against these > > > > addresses and loading the file is aborted if it would overwrite > > > > reserved memory. > > > > > > > > The memory reservation code is reused from bootm/image. > > > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > - No patch changes, but needed to resend since patman added too many cc > > > > addresses that gmail seemed to detect as spam :-( > > > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > - added code to reserve devicetree reserved-memory in lmb > > > > - added tftp fixes (patches 7 and 8) > > > > - fixed a bug in new function lmb_alloc_addr > > > > > > > > Simon Goldschmidt (8): > > > > lib: lmb: reserving overlapping regions should fail > > > > fdt: parse "reserved-memory" for memory reservation > > > > lib: lmb: extend lmb for checks at load time > > > > fs: prevent overwriting reserved memory > > > > bootm: use new common function lmb_init_and_reserve > > > > lmb: remove unused extern declaration > > > > net: remove CONFIG_MCAST_TFTP > > > > tftp: prevent overwriting reserved memory > > > > > > > > README | 9 -- > > > > common/bootm.c | 8 +- > > > > common/image-fdt.c | 52 ++++++- > > > > drivers/net/rtl8139.c | 9 -- > > > > drivers/net/tsec.c | 52 ------- > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c | 3 - > > > > fs/fs.c | 56 ++++++- > > > > include/lmb.h | 7 +- > > > > include/net.h | 17 --- > > > > lib/lmb.c | 69 +++++++++ > > > > net/eth-uclass.c | 4 - > > > > net/eth_legacy.c | 46 ------ > > > > net/net.c | 9 +- > > > > net/tftp.c | 289 +++++++---------------------------- > > > > scripts/config_whitelist.txt | 1 - > > > > 15 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 399 deletions(-) > > > > > > This is great work, but what is missing is a test for lmb. > > > > Yeah, well, the tests didn't work on my system and I figured it's > > better to get the code fixed than to use my time on trying to get the > > tests running. > > > > However, after searching for the required packages and fiddling around > > some more, I guess I made them work so I could add tests now... > > > > I also have work-in-progress for compressing fit image contents (we > > currently only support uncompressing the kernel). It will switch some > > 'lmb_reserve' calls to the new 'lmb_alloc_addr' as this is more safe. > > Maybe I can combine the tests in that series? > > After managing to get the tests to run via 'make qcheck' (and 'make > tests'; had to install much more than listed in 'test/py/README.md'), > I tried to add tests to 'test/lib/' (next to hexdump.c), but I failed > to get them run. Even chaning 'test/lib/hexdump.c' to fail did not > produce errors. Are these tests not included in 'make qcheck'?
That runs the Python tests which are in test/py/tests. Some of those tests run compiled-in code (e.g. log_test.c and cmd_ut.c). Is your test intended to be Python or C?
I thought I'd create a unit test under test/lib that calls functions from lmb.c, so that would be C code. Python would not work without adding extra commands to call from Python.
There are tests in test/lib, how do I run them?
I suspect it is lib/ since it is holds tests for library functions, although hex_to_bin() is an inline function.
Better to put tests in another dir. Maybe test/image ?
Well, my tests would ensure lib/lmb.c works as expected (especially for the corner case reported by Frank), so I though test/lib/ would be good?
I suppose so.
You can run an individual test with something like:
/tmp/b/sandbox/u-boot -d /tmp/b/sandbox/arch/sandbox/dts/test.dtb -c "ut dm lib_test_bin2hex"
where /tmp/b/sandbox is the build directory for sandbox.
OK, that worked, thanks for the hint. Did I miss this in the documentation somewhere?
No, only the help from the 'ut' command. But you could add a patch to test/README perhaps?
Once I have understood what's missing, I could do that ;-)
And are these tests executed in a standard test run (e.g. on travis)? If not, how would they be integrated?
So long as they run with 'make check' (or 'make qcheck') then you should be OK.
Since I did not get 'make check' to report a failure when changing test/lib/hexdump.c to fail, I don't think these tests are run on 'make check'. Where exactly is it defined which tests are run?
See generate_ut_subtest() for the logic.
I actually think this is a bit of a widespread problem. E.g. the bloblist tests don't run.
Regards, Simon