In message 444F74B1.8060909@imagemap.com you wrote:
Just my uninformed opinion...It seems to me that calling saveenv twice is misleading. What I mean is that I assume that I have a "golden" copy of my environment in the redundant area. I should be able to call
No. That "golden" copy is what we call "default environment" - you get this when you lose your environment (with redundand environment it means that you lose both copies).
saveenv as many times as I wish without touching the contents of the "golden" copy and that there should be another mechanism to update the "golden" copy. I had no idea that calling saveenv twice will overwrite
That's not how redundance is defined. You are looking for a backup copy, which is provided by the default environment.
Note that updating the default environment is not trivial, as this is compile-time defined.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk