
5 Aug
2017
5 Aug
'17
9:23 p.m.
On 08/03/2017 02:36 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
[...]
+static u32 uniphier_sd_readl(struct uniphier_sd_priv *priv, const u32 reg)
"const" is unneeded here.
Why? The function should not modify reg , so it is const.
Also, could you use "unsigned int" or "int" for reg?
Why?
+{
return readl(priv->regbase + reg);
+}
+static void uniphier_sd_writel(struct uniphier_sd_priv *priv,
const u32 val, const u32 reg)
Same here. Please drop "const".
Please use "unsigned int" or "int" for reg
It is OK to use u32 for val.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut