There is no-longer any need to check if sequence numbers are valid, since this is ensured by driver model. Drop the unwanted logic.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org ---
(no changes since v1)
lib/acpi/acpi_device.c | 27 +++------------------------ test/dm/acpi.c | 6 +----- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/acpi/acpi_device.c b/lib/acpi/acpi_device.c index c3439a59883..ba0e6bf9ea8 100644 --- a/lib/acpi/acpi_device.c +++ b/lib/acpi/acpi_device.c @@ -784,16 +784,6 @@ static const char *acpi_name_from_id(enum uclass_id id) } }
-static int acpi_check_seq(const struct udevice *dev) -{ - if (dev->req_seq == -1) { - log_warning("Device '%s' has no seq\n", dev->name); - return log_msg_ret("no seq", -ENXIO); - } - - return dev->req_seq; -} - /* If you change this function, add test cases to dm_test_acpi_get_name() */ int acpi_device_infer_name(const struct udevice *dev, char *out_name) { @@ -826,29 +816,18 @@ int acpi_device_infer_name(const struct udevice *dev, char *out_name) } } if (!name) { - int num; - switch (id) { /* DSDT: acpi/lpss.asl */ case UCLASS_SERIAL: - num = acpi_check_seq(dev); - if (num < 0) - return num; - sprintf(out_name, "URT%d", num); + sprintf(out_name, "URT%d", dev_seq(dev)); name = out_name; break; case UCLASS_I2C: - num = acpi_check_seq(dev); - if (num < 0) - return num; - sprintf(out_name, "I2C%d", num); + sprintf(out_name, "I2C%d", dev_seq(dev)); name = out_name; break; case UCLASS_SPI: - num = acpi_check_seq(dev); - if (num < 0) - return num; - sprintf(out_name, "SPI%d", num); + sprintf(out_name, "SPI%d", dev_seq(dev)); name = out_name; break; default: diff --git a/test/dm/acpi.c b/test/dm/acpi.c index f5eddac10d0..021f776845e 100644 --- a/test/dm/acpi.c +++ b/test/dm/acpi.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(testacpi) = { static int dm_test_acpi_get_name(struct unit_test_state *uts) { char name[ACPI_NAME_MAX]; - struct udevice *dev, *dev2, *i2c, *spi, *serial, *timer, *sound; + struct udevice *dev, *dev2, *i2c, *spi, *timer, *sound; struct udevice *pci, *root;
/* Test getting the name from the driver */ @@ -146,10 +146,6 @@ static int dm_test_acpi_get_name(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_assertok(acpi_get_name(spi, name)); ut_asserteq_str("SPI0", name);
- /* The uart has no sequence number, so this should fail */ - ut_assertok(uclass_first_device(UCLASS_SERIAL, &serial)); - ut_asserteq(-ENXIO, acpi_get_name(serial, name)); - /* ACPI doesn't know about the timer */ ut_assertok(uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TIMER, &timer)); ut_asserteq(-ENOENT, acpi_get_name(timer, name));