On Oct 20, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <6FA5D356-5762-4185- BD0C-1CE3BDEDE2D9@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
This removes a bit of code and makes it easier for the upcoming sub bootm command support to call into the proper OS specific handler.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
...
@@ -119,6 +119,22 @@ int do_bootelf (cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[]); static boot_os_fn do_bootm_integrity; #endif
+boot_os_fn * boot_os[] = {
- [IH_OS_LINUX] = do_bootm_linux,
- [IH_OS_NETBSD] = do_bootm_netbsd,
why not add config to ative or not netbsd, linux and rterms to reduce U-Boot size?
ative?
that would be an orthogonal change.
One that we should implement, I think.
So this means introducing CONFIG_BOOT_RTEMS, CONFIG_BOOT_NETBSD, and CONFIG_BOOT_LINUX.
Should these be enabled in all board configs by default?
- k