Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4CCA87B9.5090203@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4CC9E2A7.3080506@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
Replace CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS by CONFIG_BROKEN_RELOC_FIXUPSeems a slight misnomer to me, and a bit hides what it really does. What about CONFIG_NEEDS_DATA_RELOC_FIXUP ?
Thinking about that, I feel the name is too long. And eventually not clear enough either.
How about CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC ?
OK, since I had that in mind, too. I skipped it however since "manual" for me smells like really some extra manual labour. But I guess any full descriptive term would be too long.
Yes, that's what I think too.
OK, renamed into CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC.
Would it be possible for you to apply those 3 patches to a testing branch, I am having an odd error trying to git-am patch 2/3, however I can find no wrongs in the patch at the complained about places. 1/3 did apply without problems.
Done - please see branch "ifdef-cleanup" in the u-boot-testing repo.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk