Hi Tom,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:33:19PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT images, and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox.
The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT
configuration
and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is detected.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
If it helps, here are the results of my build for this series (and the trace one). No new failures but you can see quite a few problems with Xscale.
I _think_ Xscale is toolchain choice related. My question is, for arches which use --gc-sections, what is the size change from before to after, when not opting in on this?
Yes I think you are right. Unfortunately I don't have that build now, but I will redo it and check.
Regards, Simon
-- Tom