Am 06/09/2012 22:48, schrieb Tom Rini:
On 09/06/2012 12:59 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 06/09/2012 19:49, Tom Rini wrote:
On 09/06/2012 01:04 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de
spl/Makefile | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile index f96c08e..77fc405 100644 --- a/spl/Makefile +++ b/spl/Makefile @@ -109,6 +109,12 @@ $(OBJTREE)/MLO: $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin -a $(CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@ endif
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG),) +$(OBJTREE)/MLO: $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin
- $(OBJTREE)/tools/mkimage -n $(SRCTREE)/$(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG) -T imximage \
-e $(CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@+endif
ALL-y += $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin
ifdef CONFIG_SAMSUNG
Is that really the name you want? MLO comes from some part or another (I've read it, just can3't recall off-hand) of the IT ROM docs saying it will read a file named MLO.
I know...
Is mx35 in the same boat? Or just looking for a common name?
Right. It makes no sense that the binary for Freescale's SOCs has a name, for TI another one, for...we can generates less confusion if we uses the same name.
Agreed. I guess what I'm asking is, in the TI case the ROM reads FAT and must find 'MLO'. Does mx35 do the same or
No. And not only the MX35, but also the MX5/MX6.
is the post-build step "dd if=MLO of=/dev/... ..." and the filename doesn't matter?
Exactly. The ROM does not understand a filesystem, and the SPL must be stored at a fixed address in the SD card. The filename does not matter, and the SPL is not seen as file, but as a raw image.
I'm fine with the change now, just looking for the full details. Thanks!
As for Freescale the filename does not matter while for TI does, we can use for both MLO ;-)
Stefano