On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On 10 December 2015 at 23:03, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
All FSP spec v1.0 complaint FSP binary uses struct fspinit_rtbuf as defined by the 1.0 spec, however there are FSPs that does not follow 1.0 spec (possible due to that FSP predates the 1.0 spec), and future FSP binary that is complaint to v1.1 spec defines an optional paltform-specific runtime data in the struct fspinit_rtbuf. Hence move the definition to chipset header.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com Acked-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Changes in v2: None
arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h | 15 --------------- arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_support.h | 1 - 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h
Tested on Minnowmax: Tested-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
applied to u-boot-x86/next, thanks!