On 06/02/2012 01:38 PM, Stijn Souffriau wrote:
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/timer_defs.h | 2 + board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c | 19 ++++++++ include/configs/davinci_dm365evm.h | 11 +++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
First, the proper way to send revised patches is to put 'v2' or 'v3' rather than resend in the subject and to include, after the full commit message, "---" and then changes from v1 to v2, v2 to v3 and so forth. Second, I just re-read this code and the in-tree arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c code and think you really really need to sort out what magic value(s) has changed slightly and re-use that code. The reset code is the same. The programming sequence looks to be the same. I just didn't write out all of the non-0 values used to see what's different. I'm 99% certain this is small change from one revision to another of the basic IP block and you need to see what bits are being set (or not set!) in both cases and see what the differences between them are all about.