Hi Hannes,
this patch breaks most i.MX6 boards (the not DL) and I revert it. Maybe I had to ask better before, anyway:
On 22/06/2016 12:07, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
if we build for an i.mx6 (d)ual(l)ite CONFIC_MX6DL we shall use MX6DL_PAD instead the common MX6_PAD.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Schmelzer oe5hpm@oevsv.at
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h index 4b6bb18..3465205 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ enum { #include "mx6q_pins.h" #undef MX6_PAD_DECL #define MX6_PAD_DECL(name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc) \
- MX6_PAD_DECLARE(MX6DL_PAD_,name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc),
- MX6_PAD_DECLARE(MX6DL_PAD_, name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc),
#include "mx6dl_pins.h" }; #elif defined(CONFIG_MX6Q) @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ enum { #elif defined(CONFIG_MX6DL) || defined(CONFIG_MX6S) enum { #define MX6_PAD_DECL(name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc) \
- MX6_PAD_DECLARE(MX6_PAD_,name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc),
- MX6_PAD_DECLARE(MX6DL_PAD_, name, pco, mc, mm, sio, si, pc),
#include "mx6dl_pins.h" };
Can you better explain the problem you had ? The name is not decisive - the important thing is that the correct include file with the right layout is included, that means mx6dl_pins.h. And this was mainlined since a lot of time.
We have several boards with 6DL into mainline, so I am missing which is your problem.
Best regards, Stefano Babic