
2 Feb
2023
2 Feb
'23
3:49 p.m.
On 2/2/23 14:44, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
Il gio 2 feb 2023, 14:21 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu mailto:monstr@monstr.eu> ha scritto:
Hi Dario, On 1/5/23 10:46, Ashok Reddy Soma wrote: > Reserved blocks are used for storing bad block tables. With "nand bad" > command, these reserved blocks are shown as bad blocks. This is leading > to confusion when compared with Linux bad blocks. Hence, display > "bbt reserved" when printing reserved blocks with "nand bad" command. > > To acheive this, return 2 which represents reserved from nand_isbad_bbt() > instead of 1 in case of reserved blocks and catch it in cmd/nand.c. > > "nand bad" command display's hexadecimal numbers, so add "0x" prefix. > > Example log will show up as below. > > ZynqMP> nand bad > > Device 0 bad blocks: > 0x00400000 > 0x16800000 > 0x16c00000 > 0x17000000 > 0x3d800000 > 0x3e400000 > 0xe8400000 > 0xff000000 (bbt reserved) > 0xff400000 (bbt reserved) > 0xff800000 (bbt reserved) > 0xffc00000 (bbt reserved) > 0x116800000 > 0x116c00000 > 0x1ff000000 (bbt reserved) > 0x1ff400000 (bbt reserved) > 0x1ff800000 (bbt reserved) > 0x1ffc00000 (bbt reserved) > > Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.soma@amd.com <mailto:ashok.reddy.soma@amd.com>> > Reviewed-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com <mailto:michael@amarulasolutions.com>> > --- Are you going to apply this patch?
Applied already
I looked at u-boot-nand-flash git repo and I can't see it. Where's the repo where this is merged?
Thanks, Michal