Albert,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.aribaud@free.fr wrote:
Le 24/03/2011 16:08, Tom Warren a écrit :
Albert,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUDalbert.aribaud@free.fr wrote:
Le 22/03/2011 20:27, Tom Warren a écrit :
Albert,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Albert ARIBAUDalbert.aribaud@free.fr wrote:
Le 23/02/2011 21:03, Tom Warren a écrit :
OK, I'm an idiot. I see now that I needed to add -n to format-patch to add the numbering to the [PATCH] header.
Sorry for the noise - resending now with the corrected patchset.
Tom
Actually, for a single patch, you don't need to generate numbers, nor a cover letter (the 0/N message).
Is the current patch OK as is? It's a simple one-line change.
I guess so. As soon as I get confirmation from Wolfgang that board patches can go through any tree, I'll apply it as a bugfix to master.
Great. Thanks!
Applied to u-boot-arm/master.
Also, I saw your 'patches pending before release?' message. Have my Tegra 'A9 CPU' patches been applied to arm master? I'm still a little confused about the timing of the merge window vs. the release, and I'm not sure if the full set of Tegra patches will be in the next release.
Sorry, I can't get them in in the upcoming release as I barely have time to sort the pull req for today, but I'll get them on u-boot-arm/master as soon as I can after that, so they'll be available on the ARM tree until the following release, where they'll move to the mainline one.
Excellent - that's all I can ask. Thanks!
Tom
Amicalement,
Albert.