Dear Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear "J.C. Wren",
In message 17434f2e0908011243y666d2d40if6fdfd8a5c00c7c5@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was solved by adding a __xxxxx.S function the u-boot library.
In a perfect world the GCC provided libgcc.a would be "just working" and we did not have to bother about all that.
But libgcc.a fo ARM is obviously not perfect, and causes problems. So Jean-Christophe suggested to use the alternative implementation he wanted to copy from the Linux code - which again is supposed to allow to use the code in question without changes.
Just to get an idea what has to be done for this:
Do we talk about
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054627.html
without the changes to top level
Makefile arm_config.mk
?
That is, updating that patch and removing the Makefile and arm_config.mk changes would be what we want?
Best regards
Dirk