
20 Oct
2003
20 Oct
'03
1:04 a.m.
Dear Richard,
in message 921D7EFBFE9DA84E9E1FAD1065D0733B06F46B@dlee2k03.ent.ti.com you wrote:
This patch fixes a few bugs which made udelay() not work properly on 925 based systems. A while back when I increased my boards clock speed I ran into quite a few problems which resulted in these fixes.
Thanks, added. Will show up on CVS "soon".
Ummm... please don't add trailing white space.
I think the Innovator should be switched over to use a real udelay code instead of its busy spins. They do not scale at all with clock speed, and do not keep the useful timestamp properly updating.
You are probably right - patches welcome.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible
simulation!"