
5 Mar
2012
5 Mar
'12
11:04 p.m.
On 03/02/2012 03:08 PM, David Purdy wrote:
While finishing some work on support for a new machine, a build based on the latest git, I see this: ........................... U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 02 2012 - 14:48:48) Pogoplug E02
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 256 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT not enabled 0 MiB
which is very reminiscent of what Thomas Weber mentions here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117926.html Is it now considered standard and expected practice to enable CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT in the machine config ? Or is this a fluke/bug/commit error that is awaiting a fix?
It was a patch applied by mistake despite changes requested.
It's been fixed by:
commit 1f7b1743d389fec616e9021012a03847f490cd18 Author: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com Date: Mon Feb 13 15:46:27 2012 -0600
Revert "nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable" This reverts commit 4fee6c2f295f932b8febdc7ce8731ba045695fa5. It breaks boards that currently rely on soft-ecc, as pointed out here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/140872/ The reverted patch should be resubmitted with documentation, and with the CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT selected from every board that needs it. We could start by looking at what NAND driver the board selects, and whether that driver ever asks for soft ECC. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
-Scott