On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 14-08-26 02:14 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 14-08-25 07:57 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Steve,
This series implements the "fastboot flash" command for eMMC devices. It supports both raw and sparse images.
NOTES:
- the support for the "fastboot flash" command is enabled with
CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH
- the support for eMMC is enabled with
CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV
- (future) the support for NAND would be enabled with
CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_NAND(???)
This has been tested on ARMv7.
This series depends on: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/379438/
This patch is already applied.
Correct (But it wasn't when I was preparing this....)
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/382443/ (to 382446)Could you resend the above patch series one more time?
From the links it seems that in PATCH 1/4 you add the ./common/aboot.c file and at PATCH 2/4 you remove it.
Is this done on purpose?
yes: done on purpose (in order to see the history of the changes to the file....) -- see the comments in the cover letter to that patch-series!!!
Ok, Now it is clear.
Is fair as I know bsd-3L-clause license is compatible with GPL.
However, to be 100% sure I'd like to ask Tom (as he has much more legal experience than me) to confirm that this code can be added to u-boot.
OK -- note that this "bsd-3L-clause" clause is almost identical to the existing "bsd-3-clause"....
Tom, could you give your opinion on this?
So, upstream made a slight (and likely unintentional) change to the normal BSD 3 clause license and changed the last clause from "the copyright holders" to "The Linux Foundation". I've poked our legal dept about this but I suspect the best answer is to go back up to Android folks and ask them to fix this quite likely unintentional change.