Vadim,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Vadim Bendebury vbendeb@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson dianders@chromium.org wrote:
Vadim,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury vbendeb@chromium.org wrote:
For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations, observed error messages in the script output.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury vbendeb@chromium.org
tools/patman/patman.py | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py index c60aa5a..0163ccd 100755 --- a/tools/patman/patman.py +++ b/tools/patman/patman.py @@ -154,13 +154,19 @@ else:
# Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel) cmd = ''
- if ok or options.ignore_errors:
- its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
- if its_a_go: cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args, options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file, in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
- else:
print col.Color(col.RED,"Not sending emails due to checkpatch errors/warnings")Technically it could be due to other problems, too (like errors applying).
good point, what wording would you suggest?
You don't think that just removing the word "checkpatch" is enough.