
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Dear Otavio Salvador,
The i.MX23 just one USB port so disable the second controller probe when building for i.MX23.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br
Changes in v2:
- Avoid wrong clock setting in MX23
drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c index 5062af5..b7bf856 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c @@ -50,10 +50,12 @@ int mxs_ehci_get_port(struct ehci_mxs *mxs_usb, int port) usb_base = MXS_USBCTRL0_BASE;
phy_base = MXS_USBPHY0_BASE; break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MX28
case 1: usb_base = MXS_USBCTRL1_BASE; phy_base = MXS_USBPHY1_BASE; break;
+#endif
default: printf("CONFIG_EHCI_MXS_PORT (port = %d)\n", port); return -1;
@@ -67,7 +69,9 @@ int mxs_ehci_get_port(struct ehci_mxs *mxs_usb, int port)
/* This DIGCTL register ungates clock to USB */ #define HW_DIGCTL_CTRL 0x8001c000 #define HW_DIGCTL_CTRL_USB0_CLKGATE (1 << 2)
+#ifdef CONFIG_MX28
#define HW_DIGCTL_CTRL_USB1_CLKGATE (1 << 16)
+#endif
int ehci_hcd_init(int index, struct ehci_hccr **hccr, struct ehci_hcor
**hcor) { @@ -95,8 +99,12 @@ int ehci_hcd_init(int index, struct ehci_hccr **hccr, struct ehci_hcor **hcor) writel(CLKCTRL_PLL1CTRL0_EN_USB_CLKS | CLKCTRL_PLL1CTRL0_POWER,
&clkctrl_regs->hw_clkctrl_pll1ctrl0_set);
+#if defined(CONFIG_MX23)
writel(HW_DIGCTL_CTRL_USB0_CLKGATE, &digctl_ctrl->reg_clr);
What is that large space before '&digctl_regs->...' ?
My fault. I can fix it.
+#elif defined(CONFIG_MX28)
writel(HW_DIGCTL_CTRL_USB0_CLKGATE | HW_DIGCTL_CTRL_USB1_CLKGATE, &digctl_ctrl->reg_clr);
+#endif
I'm sure these can be wrapped in much more elegant way, yes?
I wanted to keep the changes at minimum; so seems the right route. What you'd like me to do? Use a temporary variable?
Either that or wrap it all in struct ehci_mxs and do these ungatings etc on a per-port basis.
I've prepared the v3 of the patch; I will give it a runtime test tomorrow and send.