Hi Tom,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:24:14 -0700, Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Albert,
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:34 PM To: Tom Warren Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Warren; Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: implement erratum 716044 workaround
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:35:11 -0700, Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Albert,
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:56 AM To: Tom Warren Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Simon Glass; Stephen Warren; Tom Warren; Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: implement erratum 716044 workaround
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:29:14 -0700, Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Albert,
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@wwwdotorg.org] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:30 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Albert Aribaud Cc: Simon Glass; Tom Warren; Stephen Warren Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: implement erratum 716044 workaround
This patchset from Stephen (includes "2/2 ARM: tegra: enable workaround
for ARM erratum 716044") are both assigned to you in PatchWork, but haven't been applied yet to ARM/master AFAICT. I found them when I was searching for unapplied Tegra patches.
Could you please take this in thru the ARM tree ASAP?
Will take them in later today. Want an ARM PR once done?
Just a notice that they're in TOT u-boot-arm/master, and I'll rebase u-boot-
tegra/next against it.
Hmm... I don't see them in ARM ToT on my side. Can you point me to the commit ID?
I think there's some confusion here. You asked if I wanted an ARM PR - I assume you thought I was Tom Rini?
I'm Tom Warren, the Tegra custodian. I'd like to see this patchset (ARM errata 716044, 2 parts, from Stephen Warren, assigned to you in PatchWork) pulled into u-boot-arm/master. Once that happens, if you let me know it's done, I can rebase u-boot-tegra.git against u-boot-arm.git so that it's pulled into the Tegra repo.
I had indeed ask if a PR was wanted, i.e. if you wanted the commits to also go to u-boot/master, as the request seemed urgent and some people prefer to use the mainline tree as their reference.
But I did mis-understand something: when you said "just a notice etc", I took this as meaning you were making the notice to me that the commits were actually there, while you were saying "no PR needed, a simple notice will do". Apologies for this msistake.
I am build-testing the two changes and will push them as soon as done.
Thanks,
Tom Warren
Amicalement,