Hi Tony,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 15:28, Tony Dinh mibodhi@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 7:10 AM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 22:49, Tony Dinh mibodhi@gmail.com wrote:
At the moment, there is no common fdt helper function specific to decoding network related information from FDTs. This new helper functional group fdt_support_net is intended to be used by board-specific code within U-Boot for various network related chores.
In this patch, create the 1st function fdt_get_phy_addr to parse the device tree to find the PHY addess of a specific ethernet device.
Tony Dinh (3): Add fdt network helper header file Add fdt network helper functions Add fdt network helper to Makefile
common/Makefile | 2 +- common/fdt_support_net.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fdt_support_net.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 common/fdt_support_net.c create mode 100644 include/fdt_support_net.h
Can this use livetre and also have some tests?
I have not enabled livetree for any of the boards I have. So I just modeled this using the existing ./common/fdt_support.c!
I do agree we should start using livetree in fdt helpers, if I understood it correctly, it should work for both flattree and
OK good, yes that's right.
livetree. Perhaps we could have another patch series after this? I am preparing another Kirkwood board support patch that I could hold off submitting and enable livetree to use that as a vehicle for testing.
I think it is better to use livetree in this patch. For testing, you can use sandbox for testing (see for example test/dm/ofnode.c)
Regards, Simon