On 03/07/2017 04:18 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/03/2017 04:17 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
Marek Vasut wrote:
On 03/01/2017 05:36 PM, Rush, Jason A. wrote:
This reverts commit b63b46313ed29e9b0c36b3d6b9407f6eade40c8f.
The Cadence QSPI device does not work with caching (introduced with the bounce buffer in this commit) on the Altera SoC platform.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Rush jason.rush@gd-ms.com
Do we really need the reverts or can we just fix the commit(s) up somehow ?
Would you prefer I squash the 2 reverts and the subsequent patch together as a single commit?
I would prefer if you answered my question :) So let me re-iterate, can we incrementally fix the driver instead of doing the revert(s) ?
I think I misunderstood your question. Could you clarify what you mean by incrementally fix the driver?
That means change it to the final form without reverting patches.
Are you asking if there is a way to fix the cache issue with the CQSPI on the Altera SoC platform? If so, I don't know if I have the knowledge to answer that. Do you have any suggestions on where one would start looking to fix the caching problem?
Uh, there is a cache problem on socfpga ? Is this series working around it then ?
Just so we have a common understanding, the reverts along with the subsequent patches get the CQSPI device working again on the Altera SoC as it used to in previous versions of U-Boot, and the CQSPI should continue to work for the TI devices Vignesh's patches were intended to fix.
Regards, Jason