Hi Neha,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 01:26, Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 25/04/23 01:12, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Neha,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 06:32, Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com wrote:
Support added for HS and GP boot binaries for AM65x.
tiboot3.bin, sysfw.itb, tispl.bin and u-boot.img: For HS devices tiboot3.bin_unsigned, sysfw.itb, tispl.bin_unsigned, u-boot.img_unsigned: For GP devices
Note that the bootflow followed by AM65x requires:
tiboot3.bin: * R5 SPL * R5 SPL dtbs sysfw.itb: * sysfw * board-cfg * pm-cfg * sec-cfg * rm-cfg
tispl.bin: * ATF * OPTEE * A53 SPL * A53 SPL dtbs
u-boot.img: * A53 U-Boot * A53 U-Boot dtbs
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com
arch/arm/dts/k3-am654-base-board-u-boot.dtsi | 1 + .../dts/k3-am654-r5-base-board-u-boot.dtsi | 1 + arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi | 551 ++++++++++++++++++ board/ti/am65x/Kconfig | 2 + 4 files changed, 555 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Is there any way that these boards could share a .dtsi with just the different bits in each board's dtsi? There seems to be a lot of duplicate.
Maybe a common k3-binman.dtsi, but the common nodes (where the filenames of both the generated file as well as component files are all common) would be the ti-board-config ones... and if we change that as per last review comment to point to board/ti/<device>/config.bin then we'd have that particular to each device as well right?
Or do you mean to say we use #defines for all?
No I just mean having a common .dtsi as you say above.
You can still override things in that if you want to, by adding a phandle and then referencing it in the board-specific file.
Regards, Simon