Oh, OK. I see what you mean. I'm still very new to this process, so it takes some practice to "learn the customs". Thanks for clarifying.
So, in future I will keep those explanations below the "---" line.
Michael Burr // Software Engineer II
Logic PD T // 612.436.7273 NOTICE: Important disclaimers and limitations apply to this email. Please see this web page for our disclaimers and limitations: http://logicpd.com/email-disclaimer/
-----Original Message----- From: Michal Simek [mailto:monstr@monstr.eu] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:19 AM To: Michael Burr Cc: hs@denx.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c:zynq: I2C multi-bus support on Zynq
On 09/24/2013 04:58 PM, Michael Burr wrote:
Sorry, Michal
I only wrote that part to explain how I was able to test on the ZC702 board (in case somebody else should want to reproduce the results).
I understand that you will sync the 'u-boot-xlnx' repo with mainline at some time in the future, on your own schedule. I was not trying to suggest that anything else be done right now.
Thanks again for your feedback,
I got this but keep in your mind that Heiko or others will apply this patch by git-am and your commit message will be the part of u-boot source code. That's why there should be focus on problems which you are trying to solve.
If you need to point/explain something then write it below your SoB line and below "---" which ensure that git-am will remove these messages.
I would suggest to you to run git format-patch and then running git am < patch to see what will be there.
Thanks, Michal
-- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform