Dear Alexandre Belloni,
On 02.07.2012 14:55, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote :
diff --git a/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h b/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h index 07b1968..ef25fa5 100644 --- a/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h +++ b/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ #define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET 0x4200 #define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_DATAFLASH_LOGIC_ADDR_CS0 + CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET) #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE 0x4200 -#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "cp.b 0xC0042000 0x22000000 0x210000; bootm" +#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "cp.b 0xC0084000 0x22000000 0x210000; bootm"
also sorry, but size is wrong here! We reduced the partition to 0x1CE000, it is about 1.8 MiB now and not 2 MiB as before.
Right, I didn't really care about the end of the kernel partition as the 9261ek has an 8MiB dataflash and my rootfs is in NAND. The kernel is around 1.7MiB using the default configuration. Maybe, we should also extend its partition ?
well, I don't care about that too cause we usually don't have a dataflash in our devices.
I think for the eval kits it would be nice to have a board support package which can be loaded from different media. Unfortunately I used to work with bare UBoot, vanilla kernel a.s.o. Therefore I have not such deep insight into the atmel provided bsp's. In short words: I tend to say we should increase the space for kernel partition but I fear to break some special bsp's. As I can see the kernel do not provide a special mapping here. If you are not aware of some other source (e.g. linux4sam), let us increase the space for kernel a bit.
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann