Dear Liu,
in message 58A20A281BAF1047B4EAE68DE5C0BDC2C82259@zch01exm21.fsl.freescale.net you wrote:
[Dave] I strongly suggest we create one lite new start.S for the NAND boot, not modify the original start.S
I'd prefer otherwise, if we can keep the #ifdeffing to a minimum.
[Dave] The new start.S for NAND boot should be very lite. same things for 85xx/86xx, creating new start.S for e500/e600 for NAND boot. I don't like some much #ifdefine n the start.S which has not good > readable.
Your quoting is a mess.
Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Please read it, and fix your quoting.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8C2A8.E5EB52D1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And stop posting HTML.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk