Hello Marek,
Am 12.06.2013 10:36, schrieb Marek Vasut:
Dear Tom Rini,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 51B555D7.5010001@denx.de you wrote:
Ok, I can change this. Envvar name "dfu_data_buf_size" is ok?
Such long names are a paint to type. As we can't buffer anything else but data, we should be able to omit this, i. e. what about
dfu_bufsiz
["bufsiz" as used for example as BUFSIZ in C89 stdio.h]
Works for me.
WFM, but I need to read the discussion around here. I just stopped playing dead beetle. Actually, I'm trying to find out why such a variable is needed at all. Can the buffer not be allocated dynamically (and thus dependant only on malloc area size)?
Please ignore this if it's been answered in one of the emails I didn't read yet.
posted a v2 for this here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/250665/
which allocates the buffer in the malloc area, dependend on the environemnt variable "dfu_bufsiz".
A reason why we should have at last a config option see here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-June/155924.html
bye, Heiko