
31 Jan
2007
31 Jan
'07
6:11 p.m.
On 1/29/07, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
In message 45BD6755.3000100@comcast.net you wrote:
On the other hand, I do not think it less logical to require a write to flash to consist of a command different from cp, since in order for it to actually work, the user must have done all the right preparation.
Call it historical reasons, then ;-)
takes no code at all. The only issue arises with cp/loadX. If we all agree there is no desire to interface anything that requires a routine to read data from it to the memory commands, then I have no desire to go there either. Presently, we have loadX commands that will work with
I do agree. Grant?
Yes, I agree.
[I really have to stop myself from writing "You can take this for Granted" :-) ]
:-P
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195