28 Apr
2009
28 Apr
'09
12:41 a.m.
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1239749550.24099.147.camel@localhost.localdomain you wrote: ...
#1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is processed.
#2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when additional OS targets are supported.
I'd vote for #1 as I think the wasted time of processing os_support.c is a drop in the bucket and it seems a bit cleaner than hacking up the Makefile.
If others have any clever ideas let me know.
It seems there were no really clever ideas, or did I miss them?
Hm.. actually I lost track of which patch is missing. Could you please send me a pointer to the latest and greatest version? Sorry & thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Men don't talk peace unless they're ready to back it up with war.
-- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4