Hi!
From: Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@altera.com
Because the SOCFPGA platform will include support for Cyclone V and Arria V FPGA parts, renaming socfpga_cyclone5 folder to socfpga to be more generic.
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@altera.com Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek pavel@denx.de Cc: Chin Liang See clsee@altera.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de CC: Pavel Machek pavel@denx.de Cc: Tom Rini trini@ti.com
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek
- Cc: Tom Rini
Do you really mean that V2 is the exact same code as V1? If it is, then V2 is unneeded. And if V2 is different from V1, then history should tells us the difference(s).
V2 is the same as v1 codewise. So should I resend this a V1 to be applied?
If V1 is the same as V2 as far as the code is concerned, then there is simply no point in sending V2 or resending V1 again.
The V2 history makes me guess you thought it necessary to officialize Pavel's Reviewed-By somehow, but that's unneeded; patchworks takes care of collecting all the {Reviewed,Acked,Tested,...}-by's and providing them when applying the patch through pwclient.
This got pretty confusing lately. Can we just wait for the patches to be applied, or do we need to take some action?
Thanks, Pavel