-----Original Message----- From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:hs@denx.de] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:11 PM To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: Changes specific to ARM relocation support
Hello Prafulla,
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
All Kirkwood based boards are supported for this new implementation ref: dovs/README.arm-relocation
should be docs/README.arm-relocation
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla@marvell.com
include/configs/mv-common.h | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mv-common.h
b/include/configs/mv-common.h
index ca9f33b..b80ad00 100644 --- a/include/configs/mv-common.h +++ b/include/configs/mv-common.h @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ #error "Unsupported SoC" #endif
+/* additions for new ARM relocation support */ +#undef CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS
Should not be necessary.
Will remove it
+#define CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE 0x00000000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR (0x00000000 + 0x1000 - \
CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE)I setup the initial stack in the SDRAM, because I didn;t know, if there is on this cpu family a better place for the initial stack. (Some cpu internal ram?)
Do you know, if we have something like this on this cpu family?
Yes, Kirkwood do have internal SRAM of 2kB size called Security SRAM I have never used it before, I will give a try to use it. Otherwise using a data cache will be other option
Regards.. Prafulla . .