On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Stefano & Marek,
can you please provide the requested information?
Hi Scott,
In message 4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com Scott Wood wrote:
In message 4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com you wrote: > Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice > if we could keep this code in sync.
Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too.
How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS?
I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted.
I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html
However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches.
Best regards, Stefano
Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience measure now. I don't need to for mx28.
Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then.
Very well then, mind merging the rest then ?
Cheers
-Scott