14 Aug
2015
14 Aug
'15
12:53 a.m.
Hi Christophe,
On 13 August 2015 at 14:28, Christophe Ricard christophe.ricard@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard christophe.ricard@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example.
Best Regards Christophe
As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that.
I agree with that. How do you want to proceed ? Do you agree to integrate the results of our exchanges for a new round ?
Yes OK, I'll have a crack at this.
Regards, Simon