Le 19/04/2012 12:04, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 19/04/2012 11:51, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4F8FBB22.5000205@aribaud.net you wrote:
Folks,
I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of 278. :(
Which version of GCC is this?
Recent tests with ELDK 5.2 (which is based on gcc version 4.6.4 20120303) show no such problems.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Seems there was a misconfiguration in my toolchain and repo -- redoing the mass build with correct settings, will update notice when done
After triple-checking the I was using the right commit (my current master) and the right toolchain ("gcc version 4.6.1 (Sourcery CodeBench Lite 2011.09-69)"), ./MAKEALL arm shows the following:
--------------------- SUMMARY ---------------------------- Boards compiled: 277 Boards with warnings or errors: 28 ( VCMA9 smdk2410 nhk8815 nhk8815_onenand apollon igep0020 igep0030 omap4_panda omap4_sdp4430 omap5_evm s5p_goni smdkc100 s5pc210_universal seaboard ventana balloon3 lubbock palmld palmtc polaris pxa255_idp trizepsiv vpac270_nor_128 vpac270_nor_256 vpac270_ond_256 xaeniax zipitz2 colibri_pxa270 ) ----------------------------------------------------------
... with still 3 build errors, for omap4_panda, omap4_sdp4430 and omap5_evm: 'internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2635', and 57 warnings of which 48 are 'uses variable-size enums yet the output is to use 32-bit enums' and 9 are 'variable [...] set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]'
So the only 'issue' is the enums, for which I'll seek a solution.
Apologies -- especially to Simon G.* -- for the noise.
Amicalement,