
7 Nov
2006
7 Nov
'06
7:46 p.m.
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 19:38, Timur Tabi wrote:
I do not want to introduce code that will not be applicable. What do you think? I guess I can put the check for robustness just in case there happens to be an odd one in the market.
My vote is to add the check that Nick suggests, simply to limit the possibility of false positives.
ACK.
Best regards, Stefan