17 Jan
2014
17 Jan
'14
1:56 p.m.
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 at 11:14:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Otavio Salvador,
In message 1389909486-12880-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br you
wrote:
This patchset does as stated in the subject. It has been build tested
as can be seen below:
What is the motivation for this change? Using zImage is - from the technical point of view - the poorest of the available choices. If you are not happy with using uImages, then why do you not move forward and use FIT images?
I am with you here. zImage is not a good format, since it's inflexible and not protected by anything (no checksum etc) at all. For deployment, it's even more poor choice.
Best regards, Marek Vasut