On Monday, January 06, 2014 at 07:22:11 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
On 4 January 2014 12:49, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On Friday, January 03, 2014 at 06:14:38 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
Hi Marek,
Thanks for review.
On 3 January 2014 06:26, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 at 10:41:59 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
Arndale board has AX88760, which is USB 2.0 Hub & USB 2.0 Ethernet Combo controller, connected to HSIC Phy of USB host controller via USB3503 hub.
This patch implements a board specific board_usb_init function in
ehci
driver to perform reset sequence for USB3503 hub and enables the relevant config options for network to work.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.singh@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kashyap@linaro.org
board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c | 13 +++++++++++++ drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 10 ++++++++++ include/configs/arndale.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c b/board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c index 052fecd..deca348 100644 --- a/board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c +++ b/board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c @@ -7,10 +7,23 @@
#include <common.h> #include <asm/arch/pinmux.h> #include <asm/arch/dwmmc.h>
+#include <asm/arch/gpio.h>
#include <asm/arch/power.h>
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+#ifdef CONFIG_USB_EHCI_EXYNOS +void exynos_board_usb_init(int value) +{
struct exynos5_gpio_part1 *gpio = (struct exynos5_gpio_part1*) +
samsung_get_base_gpio_part1();
/* Configure gpios for usb 3503 hub's reset and connect */s5p_gpio_direction_output(&gpio->x3, 5, value);s5p_gpio_direction_output(&gpio->d1, 7, value);+} +#endif
int board_init(void) {
gd->bd->bi_boot_params = (PHYS_SDRAM_1 + 0x100UL);diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c index 88e6466..4be6a60 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ static void reset_usb_phy(struct exynos_usb_phy
*usb)
set_usbhost_phy_ctrl(POWER_USB_HOST_PHY_CTRL_DISABLE);}
+inline void __exynos_board_usb_init(int value) +{ +} +void exynos_board_usb_init(int)
__attribute__((weak, alias("__exynos_board_usb_init")));Sorry, this is not happening. Why can you not use the existing board_usb_init() and instead have to invent new stuff ?
I did not use board_usb_init because it has 2 parameters which may not be used as described in usb.h for my use case, which is to only configure gpios for reset and connect of usb 3503 hub.
Let me know if you still feel that board_usb_init should be used. In that case I will have to utilize index parameter in my own way.
Shall I read that as "I will abuse API" ? You know that this will not happen ;-)
Yes, thats an abuse and have not done that yet :-)
Why can you not reset the USB HUB in regular board_usb_init() simply by toggling the switch's reset gpio as done on the rest of the boards ?
Ok, let me try this. If it works I will send the updated patch.
Thank you!