On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
"Robert P. J. Day" rpjday@crashcourse.ca writes:
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpjday@crashcourse.ca
i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or if he'd prefer a different phrasing.
diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h index 19a5ec9..9a03587 100644 --- a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h +++ b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
/*
- High Level Configuration Options
- Note that, although the BeagleBoard incorporates an OMAP 3530,
*/
- it's currently still valid to use OMAP34XX preprocessor values.
#define CONFIG_ARMCORTEXA8 1 /* This is an ARM V7 CPU core */ #define CONFIG_OMAP 1 /* in a TI OMAP core */
Since 34xx and 35xx are in fact exactly the same silicon, saying it is "currently" valid seems a bit odd. This sort of implies a planned change.
ok, i can rephrase that. i was working off of a post by dirk a couple days ago where he seemed to be suggesting that the door was open for some divergence down the road, but maybe i just misread. will fix shortly.
rday --
======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================